ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES

contact

MON-SAT 8:30AM-5:30PM

Dealer’s Talk or Trader’s Talk (The case of Philippine Steel Coating Corporation v. Eduard Quiñones, G.R. No. 194533, April 19, 2017)

A warranty is not necessarily written. It may be oral as long as it is not given as a mere opinion or judgment. Rather, it is a positive affirmation of a fact that buyers rely upon, and that influences or induces them to purchase the product. (Philippine Steel Corporation v. Eduard Quiñones, G.R. No. 194533, April 19, 2017)

Work Accident Illness Report (Labor Advisory No. 07, Series of 2022)

Pursuant to Labor Advisory No. 07, s. 2022, an employer is mandated to submit an Employer’s Work Accident/Illness Report (WAIR) to the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) every 30th day of the month, with or without any accidents or reportable work-related illnesses.
This is in compliance with the provisions of Rule 1050 of the Occupational Safety and Health Standards of the Philippines. (Labor Advisory No. 07, s. 2022)

Warranty for Quality of Goods

There are two types of warranties provided by a seller: express and implied.
An express warranty is any statement or promise made by the seller regarding the product. It is considered express if it is likely to influence the buyer’s decision to make the purchase, and if the buyer relies on it. Statements about the value of the product or opinions of the seller are not considered warranties, unless the seller is an expert and the buyer relies on their statement.
An implied warranty is not explicitly stated by the seller but is inferred by the law based on the nature of the transaction and the circumstances of the parties. It is established regardless of whether the seller intended to create it or not.
(Article 1546 of the New Civil Code; Jaime Ang vs. Court of Appeals and Bruno Soledad, G.R. No. 177874, September 29, 2008)

Productivity Standards under the Labor Code

Failure to observe prescribed standards of work, or to fulfill reasonable work assignments due to inefficiency may constitute just cause for dismissal. Such inefficiency is understood to mean failure to attain work goals or work quotas, either by failing to complete the same within the allotted reasonable period or by producing unsatisfactory results. (Iluminada Ver Buiser vs. Hon. Vicente Leogardo, G.R. No. L-63316, July 31, 1984)