ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES

contact

MON-SAT 8:30AM-5:30PM

Rule on Examination of a Child Witness (A.M. No. 004-07-SC)

The Rule on Examination of a Child Witness shall govern the examination of child witnesses who are victims of crime, accused of a crime, and witnesses to crime. It shall apply in all criminal proceedings and non-criminal proceedings involving child witnesses.

The objectives of this Rule are to create and maintain an environment that will allow children to give reliable and complete evidence, minimize trauma to children, encourage children to testify in legal proceedings, and facilitate the ascertainment of truth.

Does the utterance of foul and abusive language against a supervisor amount to serious misconduct?

Photo from Pexels | cottonbro studio The following post does not create a lawyer-client relationship between Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Offices (or any of its lawyers) and the reader. It is still best for you to engage the services of a lawyer or you may directly contact and consult Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Read more about Does the utterance of foul and abusive language against a supervisor amount to serious misconduct?[…]

The Supreme Court decides: Where the accused security professional is licensed to exercise their profession and is equipped with a permit sanctioned by law, possession of the issued firearm under a belief in good faith that it is licensed is a valid defense in a case for illegal possession of firearm.

In the case of Hilario Cosme v. People of the Philippines, the Supreme Court held that where the accused security professional is licensed to exercise their profession and is equipped with a permit sanctioned by law, possession of the issued firearm under a belief in good faith that it is licensed is a valid defense in a case for illegal possession of firearm.

Guidelines on Submission of Electronic Copies of Pleadings and Other  Court Submissions being Filed before the Lower Courts pursuant to the Efficient Paper Rule

The Supreme Court En Banc, in A.M. No. 22-04-26-SC, crafted the Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations for 2022-2027, which lays down the reform initiatives necessary toward achieving a technology-driven Judiciary. A key activity in the Innovation outcome in the Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations for 2022-2027 is the development of an eCourt System Version 2.0 (eCourt PH 2.0) for the digitalization of adjudication.

Does the two-notice rule apply to probationary employees?

SECTION 2. Security of Tenure. — ….
For termination of employment based on just causes as defined in Article 288 of the Labor Code:
(i) A written notice served on the employee specifying the ground or grounds for termination, and giving said employee reasonable opportunity within which to explain his side.
(ii) A hearing or conference during which the employee concerned, with the assistance of counsel if he so desires, is given opportunity to respond to the charge, present his evidence, or rebut the evidence presented against him.
(iii) A written notice of termination served on the employee, indicating that upon due consideration of all the circumstances, grounds have been established to justify his termination.

Rules on Electronic Notarization under A.M. No. 24-10-14-SC

The Rules on Electronic Notarization is adopted to facilitate the provision of technology-based notarial services, with a view to supplementing the traditional mode of notarization under the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice. The Rules shall govern the electronic documents through In-Person Electronic Notarization and Remote Electronic Notarization.

Notarization of paper documents and instruments with handwritten signature or marks shall continue to be governed by the 2024 Rules on Notarial Practice.

In the absence of any applicable provision in the Rules, the pertinent provisions of the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice may be applied by analogy or in a suppletory manner.

Exceptions to the rule requiring the communication of reasonable standards to a probationary employee

In the case of C.P. Reyes Hospital et al., vs. Barbosa, G.R. No. 228357, April 16, 2024, the Supreme Court laid down the exceptions to the general rule that probationary employment may be terminated, among other grounds, when the employee fails to qualify as a regular employee in accordance with reasonable standards made known by the employer to the employee at the time of engagement.