ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES ALBURO ALBURO AND ASSOCIATES LAW OFFICES

contact

MON-SAT 8:30AM-5:30PM

The Supreme Court decides: Illegally dismissed probationary employees, like regular employees are entitled to backwages not only until the expired portion of their probationary period but covering the time from when compensation was withheld up to reinstatement.

Photo from Pexels | Laura James


The following post does not create a lawyer-client relationship between Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Offices (or any of its lawyers) and the reader. It is still best for you to engage the services of a lawyer or you may directly contact and consult Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Offices to address your specific legal concerns, if there is any.

Also, the matters contained in the following were written in accordance with the law, rules, and jurisprudence prevailing at the time of writing and posting, and do not include any future developments on the subject matter under discussion.

 


AT A GLANCE:

In the case of C.P. Reyes Hospital vs. Barbosa, G.R. No. 228357, April 16, 2024, the Supreme Court ruled that backwages due to the illegally dismissed probationary employees are not limited to the unexpired portion of the probationary period but cover the time when the compensation was withheld up to reinstatement.


 

FACTS:

In September 2013, Barbosa signed a six-month probationary employment contract with C.P. Reyes Hospital, during which time she would train as a Staff Nurse, then as a Ward Head Nurse, and finally as a Training Supervisor. However, on December 30, 2013, C.P. Reyes Hospital terminated her probationary employment, citing negative performance feedback.

This prompted Barbosa to file a complaint for illegal dismissal against C.P. Reyes Hospital.

The Labor Arbiter ruled that Barbosa was illegally dismissed, finding that the numerical passing marks given by her evaluators showed she successfully met C.P. Reyes Hospital’s standards.

While the NLRC subsequently reversed the Labor Arbiter, the Court of Appeals reinstated the Labor Arbiter’s ruling in favor of Barbosa.

 

ISSUE: Whether or not Barbosa was illegally dismissed, thus entitled to backwages.

 

RULING:

Yes. Barbosa was illegally dismissed, thus entitled to backwages.

Probationary employment may be terminated when the employee fails to qualify as a regular employee in accordance with reasonable standards made known by the employer to the employee at the time of engagement.

However, in Barbosa’s case, the Court found her dismissal baseless since she obtained the passing grades needed to meet the standards for regularization based on the probationary employment contract.

On the other hand, the Court found C.P. Reyes Hospital’s claims of unsatisfactory performance ungenuine as they were only issued two weeks after Barbosa had already been terminated and without an accompanying performance evaluation.

As Barbosa was illegally dismissed, she is entitled to reinstatement, full backwages, and other benefits.

To determine the amount of backwages due Barbosa, the Court harmonized conflicting jurisprudence.

The Court clarified that illegally dismissed probationary employees, like regular employees, are entitled to backwages up to their actual reinstatement and not only until the end of their probationary period.

In case reinstatement is not feasible, backwages shall be computed from the time compensation was withheld up to the finality of the Decision in the illegal dismissal case.

The Court held that both the Constitution and the Labor Code did not distinguish between regular and probationary employees in guaranteeing the right to security of tenure.

It added that the mere lapse of the probationary period without regularization does not by itself sever the employment relationship. Without any valid grounds to dismiss a probationary employee, there is no basis to terminate the employment. Thus, the employee is entitled to work even beyond the probationary period.

The Court thus ruled that in Barbosa’s case, backwages should be computed from January 1, 2014, when compensation was withheld from her, until the finality of the Court’s decision.

 

Source:

C.P. Reyes Hospital and Angeline M. Reyes vs. Gerladine M. Barbosa
G.R. No. 228357 | April 16, 2024

 

Click here to subscribe to our newsletter

 

Alburo Alburo and Associates Law Offices specializes in business law and labor law consulting. For inquiries regarding legal services, you may reach us at info@alburolaw.com, or dial us at (02)7745-4391/ 0917-5772207/ 09778050020.

All rights reserved.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

0 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share